Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Batiste, 594 So. 2d 1.

544 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Jerry L. Lefeat La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, Ait is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.@ (La.App.
State v. Bivens 74 So. 3d 782 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Ricardo K. Dukes La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may 3 provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State v. Dukes 66 So. 3d 598 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may 14provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Courtney Paul Savoy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. J. S. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
While -6- a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State v. J.S. 63 So. 3d 1185 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
While |7a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Jason D. Clayton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Edward Charles Morris La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State v. Clayton 64 So. 3d 418 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State v. Morris 63 So. 3d 389 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Felton Hurst, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Hurst 62 So. 3d 327 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Denna L. Decuir La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Sherrel King La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State v. King 61 So. 3d 810 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State v. Decuir 61 So. 3d 782 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Joshua Derrick Davis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. George Jameson Gray, III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State v. Davis 58 So. 3d 631 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (LaApp.
State of Louisiana v. Jonathan Edward Boyer La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State v. Boyer 56 So. 3d 1119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Kenneth Jay Clark La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Douglas Cody Sneed La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Douglas C. Sneed La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Douglas L. Sneed La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State v. Clark 52 So. 3d 304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Roch Michael Bordelon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Michael W. Hood La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. H. A., Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Brian Keith Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. B. M. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Kevin T. Arndt La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State v. HA, SR. 47 So. 3d 34 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State v. Thomas 48 So. 3d 1210 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State v. Bordelon 48 So. 3d 1186 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State v. McMillan 43 So. 3d 297 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. Joshua Daniel Sibley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Louis Vernon Jackson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may 8 provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Bianca Turner La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State v. Sibley 41 So. 3d 581 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State v. Turner 38 So. 3d 1243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Andrae Rashun Allen La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Allen 36 So. 3d 1091 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. Keyowaski M. Doucet La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. Arlene Reed Salameh La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Charles Johnson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Moses Buchanan La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State v. Doucet 36 So. 3d 1105 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Salameh 38 So. 3d 568 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.