Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Theriot v. Fuel Service System Corp., 181 So. 3d 700.

56 citing documents.

Laurie Marshall Versus Travis Thurman La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
Earl Joseph Gorio, Jr. v. Karla Danielle Gorio La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2025
Morgan Mccann Thibodeaux v. Luke Joseph Thibodeaux La. 2025
Gregory Rasbury v. Amber Nichole Rasbury La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
Morgan Mccann Thibodeaux v. Luke Joseph Thibodeaux La. 2025
11/23/15), Ehlinger v. Ehlinger , 2017-1120 (La.
Devan Simpson v. Joshua Jagneaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
Jamar A. Flowers v. Adrienne D. Tasker La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2025
Elizabeth LeBlanc Schroeder v. Alan Conrad Schroeder La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2025
Jennifer L. Stewart v. Darren DeSoto La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
Brittany Nicole Sharp v. Joshua Malone Jordan La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
11/ 23/ 15), Jenkins v. Jenkins, 2023- 0087 ( La.
Ashley Hudson Murray v. Thaddeus Murray, Sr. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
11/23/15), (citations omitted).
John Pickney Morgan v. Feliciana Lopez Morgan La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
11123115), Jenkins v. Jenkins, 2023- 0087 (La.
Whitney Condon v. Horace Condon, Jr. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
Celeste Reed Obo Ava Cope v. Black Star Energy Services, LLC and Texas Mutual Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
11/20/15), this court discussed the “going-and-coming rule” and its exceptions as follows: Generally, injuries sustained by an employee while traveling to and from work are not considered to have occurred within the course of employment and, therefore, are not compensable under the Workers’ Compensation Act.
Lucille Jones v. Jimmy Rogers La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
11/20/15), a “parking lot qualified as the ‘employer’s premises’ for purposes of finding coverage in workers’ compensation.” Edigo, 283 So.2d at 596.
Andrew Taylor Smith v. Angelica Harmon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
11/23/15), reaffirmed the primacy of the best interest of the child in making custody determinations: The best interest of the child is the sole criterion to be met in making a custody award, as the trial court sits as a sort of fiduciary on behalf of the child and must pursue actively that course of co
Jamie L. Rabalais v. Derek Rabalais La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
Whitney Nicole Cochran v. Stephen Carl Loewer La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
Wendy Marie Martinez Couvillon v. Michael Andre Couvillon La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
Lance Boudreaux v. Carley Webster La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
Jaime Rigmaiden v. Sloane Dellafosse La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
11/23/15), (citations omitted).
Caleb James Simmons v. Ashley Nikole Hodges La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
11/23/15), : The best interest of the child is the sole criterion to be met in making a custody award, as the trial court sits as a sort of fiduciary on behalf of the child and must pursue actively that course of conduct which will be of the greatest benefit to the child.
In Re: Dative Tutorship of The Minor Child Bailey Moore La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
11/23/15), Smith v. Holloway, 53,352 (La.
Faye Harvey & Nelford Harvey v. Laramie D. Harper La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana, Department of Children and Family Services, Child Support enforcement/iv-d Da v. David Alan Landry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
Shaun Michael Estay v. Erin Flannery Estay La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
11/ 23/ 15), When Mondays were not school days, Shaun' s physical custody continued until 6: 00 p. m. that Monday.
Andrew Taylor Smith v. Angelica Harmon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
Jason M. Underwood v. Leigh A. Underwood La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
David W. Beem v. Kimberly D. Beem La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
11/ 23/ 15), Harrell v. Harrell, 2017- 0561 ( La.
Krystal Szalajeski v. Kenneth Szalajeski La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
Jamie Killian Coody v. John Allen Coody La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
Allan Keith Paille, Jr. v. Beatriz Trinidad Acosta Newell and James Keith Newell, Jr. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
R. S. 9: 335 and Hodges v. Hodges, 2015- 0585, ( La.
Benny Council v. Tameka Collins Livingston La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
Kathleen Edigo and David Edigo v. Otis Elevator Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
11/20/15), (casino employee struck by another employee in the employee parking lot).3 If the parking lot qualifies as the employer’s premises, an elevator inside the employer’s building can not subject the employer to tort liability due to a premise defect.
David Michael Craig v. Shari Renee Bishop La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Jones v. Jones 274 So. 3d 811 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
J.P. v. A.D. 265 So. 3d 860 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
J. P. v. A. D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Cooper v. Chamberlain 266 So. 3d 316 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
11/23/15), , 703, the Supreme Court explained that once the trial court arrives at a decision to award joint custody, La.
Lewis v. Lewis 255 So. 3d 1216 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
11/23/15), , 706, the Supreme Court held that "[a]lthough each parent can share physical custody, the court can only designate a single domiciliary parent."
Ehlinger v. Ehlinger 251 So. 3d 418 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
11/23/15), , 702 ; Harrell v. Harrell, 17-0561 (La.App.
Phillip Vidrine v. Danielle Vidrine La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
11/23/15), constituted legal error.
Vidrine v. Vidrine 245 So. 3d 1266 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
11/23/15), constituted legal error.
Hannah Leblanc v. Cody Welch La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Leblanc v. Welch 240 So. 3d 291 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Danielle Ganaway v. Kyle Ganaway La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
11/23/15), indicating that “the court can only designate a single domiciliary parent.” We disagree with Kyle’s suggestion that evidence concerning whether the proposed relocation was in the best interest of the children expanded the pleadings and placed modification of custody in front of the trial court.
Ganaway v. Ganaway 238 So. 3d 540 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
11/23/15), , 706, indicating that "the court can only designate a single domiciliary parent."
Harrell v. Harrell 236 So. 3d 704 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Kaptein v. Kaptein 221 So. 3d 231 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Tinsley v. Tinsley 211 So. 3d 405 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017