Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Dean, 625 So. 2d 146.

197 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Zhane Quinn Persley La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
Generally, evidence of other acts of misconduct is not admissible because it creates the risk that the defendant will be convicted of the present offense simply because the unrelated evidence establishes him or her as a “bad person.” (La.
State of Louisiana v. Cortney Fitzgerald La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana Versus Maynor Ramos La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana Versus Carolina Morales La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Charles L. Williams La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana Versus Press Shorter, III La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
Mark Jones Versus State of Louisiana La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana Versus Irwin Gomez-Colon La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana v. Robin Darrell Allen La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
In support of his argument, (La.
State of Louisiana v. Alfred Simmons La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
State Of Louisiana v. George Cepriano La. 2020
“ ‘This court has recognized the principle that where the element of intent is regarded as an essential ingredient of the crime charged, it is proper to admit proof of similar but disconnected crimes to show the intent with which the act charged was committed.’” (La.
State of Louisiana v. Troy Allen La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
The Taylor Court stated: “This court has recognized the principle that where the element of intent is regarded as an essential ingredient of the crime charged, it is proper to admit proof of similar but disconnected crimes to show the intent with which the act charged was committed.” (La.
State of Louisiana Versus Delcome David Evans La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana Versus Emmett Garrison, IV AKA "Lil Emmet" La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Steven Arnold La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana v. Brian Anthony Porter La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State v. Barnett 267 So. 3d 209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Jackson , , 149 (La.
State v. Martin 262 So. 3d 279 La. 2019
State v. Jackson , , 149 (La.
State v. Flag 262 So. 3d 1018 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Jackson , , 149 (La.
State v. Jackson 265 So. 3d 928 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Floyd 250 So. 3d 1165 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
The defendant argues that because the evidence that he performed oral sex on the victim when she was around 5 years old was more serious than the instant offense for which he was charged, (La.
State v. Colby 244 So. 3d 1260 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
2/22/07), ; State v. Jackson , (La.
State v. Cooley 247 So. 3d 1159 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
art. 404(B) ; State v. Jackson , (La.
State v. Kurz 245 So. 3d 1219 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
State v. Jackson 246 So. 3d 646 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
App. 2 Cir. 6/22/11), , citing State v. Jackson , (La.
State v. Kennedy 227 So. 3d 243 La. 2017
State v. Robertson 243 So. 3d 1196 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
art. 404(B)(1) ; State v. Jackson , (La.
State v. Mosley 223 So. 3d 158 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
State v. Maize 223 So. 3d 633 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Berry 221 So. 3d 967 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
State v. Young 216 So. 3d 236 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
State v. Breedlove 213 So. 3d 1195 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
State v. Walker 206 So. 3d 474 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Joseph 208 So. 3d 1036 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State of Louisiana v. Joseph Taylor 217 So. 3d 283 La. 2016
“‘This court has recognized the principle that where the element of intent is regarded as an essential ingredient of the crime charged, it is proper to admit proof of similar but disconnected crimes to show the intent with which the act charged was committed.’” (La.
State v. Simmons 190 So. 3d 1274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Marshall, 13-233 (La.App.
State v. Wilson 189 So. 3d 513 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
State v. Small 189 So. 3d 1129 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
State v. Porter 185 So. 3d 153 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
State v. Wallace 185 So. 3d 795 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Fair 182 So. 3d 1238 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
First, one of the factors listed in Article 404(B) “must be at issue, have some independent relevance, or be an element of the crime charged in order for the evidence to be admissible.”
State v. Johnson 182 So. 3d 378 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Dale 180 So. 3d 528 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State v. Bell 178 So. 3d 234 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Moody 178 So. 3d 1031 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State v. Bell 179 So. 3d 683 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State v. Jordan 174 So. 3d 1259 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State v. Bruce, 47,055 (La.App.2d Cir.5/25/12)
State v. Thompson 163 So. 3d 139 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State v. Bruce, 47,055 (La.App.2d Cir.5/25/12)
State of Louisiana v. William Felix Vail La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State v. Vail 150 So. 3d 576 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Jackson, 93-424 (La.10/18/93), .

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by