Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Strain, 585 So. 2d 540.

146 citing documents.

State of Louisiana Versus Joel J. Faucheux, Jr. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana v. Desmond Deondre Scarborough La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana v. Tyson Cornelison La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
State Of Louisiana v. Donovan Darville La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Marcel N. Dugar La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
State Of Louisiana v. David H. Brown (Parish of Lafourche) Convictions Affirmed; Death Sentences Reversed; Case Remanded For … La. 2021
State of Louisiana v. Coca L. Edwards, Jr. La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
State v. Barnett 267 So. 3d 209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Strain , , 542-43 (La.
State v. England 268 So. 3d 1178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
6/30/00), (per curiam), quoting State v. Strain , , 544 n. 7 (La.
State v. Mingo 244 So. 3d 629 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Jeffrey Clark 220 So. 3d 583 La. 2016
State v. Johnson 182 So. 3d 1039 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
2 Cir. 4/8/09), , citing United States v. Bennett, 539 F.2d 45 (10th Cir.1976); State v. Bridgewater, 2000-1529 (La.1/15/02), .
State v. Ferguson 181 So. 3d 120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Boyd 171 So. 3d 1250 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. O'Brien 168 So. 3d 627 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Conner 152 So. 3d 209 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
State v. Drumgole, 31,294 (La.App.2d Cir.10/28/98), .
State of Louisiana v. Thaddius Brock Bergeron La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Furthermore, -44 (La.1991), the supreme court stated: When an accused waives his right to counsel in pleading guilty to a misdemeanor, the trial judge should expressly advise him of his right to counsel and to appointed counsel if he is indigent.
State v. Bergeron 127 So. 3d 1075 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Furthermore, -44 (La.1991), the supreme court stated: When an accused waives his right to counsel in pleading guilty to a misdemeanor, the trial judge should expressly advise him of his right to counsel and to appointed counsel if he is indigent.
State v. Jones 125 So. 3d 1169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
the Louisiana Supreme Court emphasized that the determination of a valid waiver of counsel during a guilty plea depends on the entire record and not just by certain magic words used by the trial judge.
State v. Jones 123 So. 3d 758 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
the Louisiana Supreme Court emphasized that the determination of a valid waiver of counsel during a guilty plea depends on the entire record and not just on certain “magic” words used by the trial judge.
State v. Mendoza 113 So. 3d 288 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2013
experience foreign to Green, and that prior Boykinizations indicated a repeated exposure to Miranda rights and were relevant); Rosales, supra (finding the defendant’s waiver of counsel valid where defendant pleaded to an uncomplicated DWI misdemeanor offense despite a lack of inquiry into the defendant’s education, mental condition or understanding of his waiver of counsel); (finding crimes of driving while intoxicated are non-complex crimes, and are almost self-explanatory, thus requiring less
State of Louisiana v. Richard Vital La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
art. 556.1 to the trial court‘s use of an en masse Boykin procedure, the validity of any guilty plea ―‗depends upon the circumstances of each case.‘‖ State v. Filer, 00-0073, p. 2 (La.6/30/00), ( n. 7 (La.1991)).
State of Louisiana v. Richard Vital La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
art. 556.1 to the trial court‘s use of an en masse Boykin procedure, the validity of any guilty plea ―‗depends upon the circumstances of each case.‘‖ State v. Filer, 00-0073, p. 2 (La.6/30/00), ( n. 7 (La.1991)).
State v. Vital 107 So. 3d 1274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
art. 556.1 to the trial court’s use of an en masse Boykin procedure, the validity of any guilty plea “ ‘depends upon the circumstances of each case.’ ” State v. Filer, 00-0073, p. 2 (La.6/30/00), ( n. 7 (La.1991)).
State v. Vital 107 So. 3d 1279 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
art. 556.1 to the trial court’s use of an en masse Boykin procedure, the validity of any guilty plea “ ‘depends upon the circumstances of each case.’ ” State v. Filer, 00-0073, p. 2 (La.6/30/00), ( n. 7 (La.1991)).
State of Louisiana v. Dexter Holder La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Holder 101 So. 3d 1059 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Hayes 107 So. 3d 668 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
1461 (1938); (trial courts should inquire into the accused’s age, education, and mental condition in deciding, on a totality of the circumstances, whether accused understands significance of waiver).
State v. Maffett 105 So. 3d 138 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
ows that he advised the court that he did not agree with the factual basis provided by the state, but argues that the court failed to inquire into his understanding of the knowing and intelligent waiver of his rights, such as asking his “age, education, experience, background, competency and conduct of the accused, as well as the nature, complexity and seriousness of the charge.”
State v. Dillon 101 So. 3d 970 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2012
State v. Rosales 94 So. 3d 36 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2012
State v. Carter 84 So. 3d 499 La. 2012
1461 (1938); (trial courts should inquire into the accused’s age, education, and mental condition in deciding, on a totality of the circumstances, whether accused understands significance of waiver).
State v. Domino 60 So. 3d 659 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Bell 53 So. 3d 437 La. 2010
State v. Shelton 39 So. 3d 601 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
The Louisiana Supreme Court has consistently stated that the knowing and intelligent nature of a defendant’s waiver of rights “ ‘depends upon the circumstances of each case.’ ” State v. Filer, 00-0073 (La.6/30/00), (per curiam), , 544 n. 7 (La.1991).
State v. Laster 33 So. 3d 259 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Simmons, 05-1462 (La.03/17/06)
State v. Vicknair 32 So. 3d 238 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
the Louisiana Supreme Court emphasized that the determination of a valid waiver of counsel during a guilty plea depends on the entire record and not just by certain magic words used by the trial judge.
State v. Crosby 6 So. 3d 1281 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Gaines 5 So. 3d 915 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Clement 1 So. 3d 547 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that in accepting a waiver of counsel at trial, the trial judge should advise the accused of the nature of the charges and the penalty range, should inquire into the accused’s age, education and mental condition, and should | ^determine according to the totality of th
State v. Franklin 996 So. 2d 387 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
He asserts the court never asked if he knew the elements of the charges against him or the possible penalty ranges and did not ascertain his educational level or ability to understand the proceedings and potential consequences
State v. Mead 988 So. 2d 740 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Drumgole, 31,294 (La.
State v. Campbell 983 So. 2d 810 La. 2008
(citing Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458 , 58 S.Ct.
State v. Lewis 982 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
State v. *869 Strain, State v. Moore, 06-875 (La.App.
State v. Lewis 982 So. 2d 870 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
State v. Moore, 06-875 (La.App.
State v. Daigle 974 So. 2d 869 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
at 542 (La.1991); State v. Rodrigue, 795 So.2d at 493 .
State v. Carrere 973 So. 2d 179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
State v. LaGarde 970 So. 2d 1111 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
State v. Mathieu 960 So. 2d 296 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
State v. Estes 956 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Brooks, supra ; State v. Munholland, 34,941 (La.App.