Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Orgeron on Behalf of Orgeron v. McDonald, 639 So. 2d 224.

139 citing documents.

Eva James Irving v. Our Lady of Wisdom Health Center La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
7/5/94), -27 (citing W. Page Keeton et al., Prosser and Keeton on the Law of Torts § 70 (5th ed. 1984)).
Faith Miller, Individually and on Behalf of Her Minor Child, Jeremy Strahin, Jr. Versus Morteza Shamsnia, Republic Fire … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
Megan Majoue v. Cody Fish, Lamarque Ford, Inc., Eric Paul Mallet, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Troy … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
6 7/5/94), (citation omitted)).
Celeste Reed Obo Ava Cope v. Black Star Energy Services, LLC and Texas Mutual Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
7/5/94), the Louisiana Supreme Court, in discussing the traveling between worksites exception to the “going and coming rule,” stated: The going and coming rule applies nicely when the employee has a fixed place of work, so that his traveling back and forth between his home and his fixed place of work is almost never i
Eugene Latour, II v. Emanee Q. Brock, Et Al. La. 2023
Trinidad Preciado v. Beaucoup Crawfish of Eunice La Restaurant Association Sif La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
Orgeron v. McDonald, 93–1353 (La.7/5/94)
Gregory Jones, Jr. v. the Boot Bar & Grill, C. Napco, Inc., Craig Napoli, Nancy Napoli, Aline Napoli, … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
Nicholas J. Quatroy Versus Andrew Michael Thornton, Perrone & Sons, L.L.C. and Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
Lionel Jones and Willie Wilson v. Maryland Casualty Company, Zurich American Insurance Company, Powell's Cable Company and Karen … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
CD Individually and as Tutor of His Minor Child SD v. SC, Individually and as the Parent and … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
7/5/94), Payne v. Stanley, 53,773 (La.
Jennifer Cross and Jennifer Cross on Behalf of the Minor Child N.C. v. St. Bernard Parish School Board … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
Brian Mullen v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
Robert James Lee Guidry v. Worknet 2000, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
Thaddeus Jeffery Johnson, Sr., Individually, Candace Howard, Individually and on behalf of their minor child Thaddeus Jeffery Johnson, … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
Timothy D. Koehl Versus Rli Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
Andrew F. Payne v. Gregory Glen Stanley, Mitchell B. Stanley, and Michael Brian Stanley La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
7/5/94), Candler v. Henderson, 48,441 (La.
Monica D. Duran v. Allmerica Financial Benefit Insurance Company, The MER Rouge State Bank, Louisiana Farm Bureau Mutual … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
Orgeron v. McDonald, 93–1353 (La.7/5/94), Winzer v. Richards, 50,330 (La.
Wade Conner v. Klarc Lemelle La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
7/5/94), –27; see also Timmons v. Silman, 99-3264 (La.
Brock Simon v. Farm Bureau Insurance Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
Gordon R. Sibley and wife, Carolyn A. Sibley, and Katelyn D. Sibley, a minor by and through, Gordon … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
7/ 5/ 94), - 27; Holt, 117 So.
McCallon v. Key Energy Servs., LLC 271 So. 3d 249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
7/5/94), , 228, where the employer's interception of an employee traveling home from work and rerouting him to another job via the employer's office was held to evidence a "high degree of employer control and employer benefit in the specially ordered trip ...
Michael McCallon v. Key Energy Services, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
7/5/94), where the employer’s interception of an employee traveling home from work and rerouting him to another job via the employer’s office was held to evidence a “high degree of employer control and employer benefit in the specially ordered trip .
Thibodeaux v. GEICO Cas. Co. 255 So. 3d 573 La. 2018
1994), , this decision expands the doctrine of vicarious liability, which should ordinarily be construed strictly, to cover any optional trainings offered by employers that may improve or increase an employee's skills.
Karen Sue Thibodeaux v. Geico Casualty Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Thibodeaux v. GEICO Cas. Co. 249 So. 3d 114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Richey v. Miller 247 So. 3d 964 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Johnson v. Transit Mgmt. of Se. La., Inc. 239 So. 3d 973 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
7/5/94), , 227 (citing LeBrane , supra ).
Collins v. Davis 214 So. 3d 974 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Lemmon v. de la Mora 215 So. 3d 264 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Loya v. Lucas 201 So. 3d 928 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Robinson v. Ky Quang Nguyen 201 So. 3d 922 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Ledet ex rel. Ledet v. Robinson Helicopter Co. 195 So. 3d 89 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Timmons, 761 So.2d at 510 , citing Orgeron v. McDonald, 93-1353 (La.7/5/94), -27 .
Winzer v. Richards 185 So. 3d 876 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Orgeron v. McDonald, 93-1353 (La.7/5/94), ; Woolard v. Atkinson, supra.
Sharp v. United Fire & Indemnity Co. 185 So. 3d 830 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Orgeron v. McDonald, 93-1353 (La.7/5/94), .
Darius M. Jack v. Ralph A. McFarland La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
7/5/94), Reed v. House of Décor, Inc.
Jack v. McFarland 175 So. 3d 1169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Orgeron on Behalf of Orgeron v. McDonald, 93-1353 (La.7/5/94), ; Reed v. House of Décor, Inc.
Patricia Parker v. Town of Woodworth La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Orgeron on Behalf of Orgeron v. McDonald, 93-1353 (La.7/5/94), -227, citing W. Page Keeton et al., Prosser and Keeton on the Law of Torts § 70 (5 th ed.1984).
Hopper v. Austin 163 So. 3d 8 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Orgeron on Behalf of Orgeron v. McDonald, 93-1353 (La.7/5/94), ; Alford v. State Farm Auto.
Parker v. Town of Woodworth 160 So. 3d 1113 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Orgeron on Behalf of Orgeron v. McDonald, 93-1353 (La.7/5/94), -227 , citing W. Page Keeton et al., Prosser and Keeton on the Law of Torts § 70 (5th ed.1984).
Lakeisha Waterstraat v. Vernon Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Bova v. Butler 168 So. 3d 551 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
An employee is acting within the course and scope of his employment when his action is “of the kind that he is employed to perform, occurs substantially within the authorized limits of time and space, and is activated at least in part by a purpose to serve the employer.” Timmons , 99-3264 at p. 4, 761 So.2d at 510 (quoting Orgeron v. McDonald, 93-1353 (La.7/5/94), 227 ).
Julia B. Voinche v. Joseph Beaud Capps La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Voinche v. Capps 155 So. 3d 146 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Phrased another way, an employee’s conduct is considered to be within the course and scope of his employment if it is “of the kind that he is employed to perform, occurs substantially within the authorized limits of time and space, and is activated at least in part by a purpose to serve the employer.” Orgeron v. McDonald, 93-1353, p. 4 (La.7/5/94), -27 .
Webb v. Webb 165 So. 3d 157 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
An employee is acting within the course and scope of his employment when the employee’s action is “of the kind that he is employed to perform, occurs substantially within the authorized limits of time and space, and is activated at least in part by a purpose to serve the employer.” Orgeron v. McDonald, 93-1353 (La.7/5/94), -27 .
Powell v. Gramercy Insurance Co. 140 So. 3d 324 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
the court discussed in detail the application of the “course and scope” concept and initially pointed out that an employer is answerable for the damage occasioned by his servant in the exercise of the functions in which the servant is employed.
Black v. Johnson 137 So. 3d 170 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Orgeron on Behalf of Orgeron v. McDonald, 93-1353 (La.7/5/94), ; Woolard v. Atkinson, 43,322 (La.App.2d Cir.7/16/08), .
Portillo v. Progressive Paloverde Insurance Co. 138 So. 3d 696 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Orgeron v. McDonald, 93-1353 (La.7/5/94) .
Ursula Marie Ratliff v. Regional Extended Home Care Personnel Services, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Rattliff v. Regional Extended Home Care Personnel Services, L.L.C. 134 So. 3d 129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Orgeron v. McDonald, 93-1353 (La.7/5/94), ).
Joseph D. Potier v. Acadian Ambulance Service, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Orgeron v. McDonald, 93-1353 (La.7/5/94)