Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Batiste, 594 So. 2d 1.
-
State of Louisiana v. Dewey Glenn Burnworth, Jr.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
0/03), a panel of this court observed that: 7 While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Cassetti Dewayne Brown, Jr.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
3), a panel of this court observed that: 14 While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Jeffery Lynn Cooley
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Eddie Ray Jackson, Jr.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. D'Mycal Lmontay Turner
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Detonio M. Smith
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
While a 2 comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
- State of Louisiana v. Lorenzo Zachery Zeigler La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
-
State of Louisiana v. J' Vonte Melik Sterling
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Solomon Burke Guillory, Jr.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (LaApp.
-
State of Louisiana v. Lonnie B. Kirklin, Jr. A/K/A Lonnie Bernard Kirklin, Jr.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Kelby Meaux A/K/A Kelby D. Meaux
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Ezikel Ruben, Jr.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Ezikel Ruben, Jr.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
2d 1061, a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State 8 v. Batiste, (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Brady Louis Vice, Sr.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Terry Len Joseph
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Trivual A. Charles
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Blain K. Bass
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
So.2d 786, 789, writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Douglas Wayne Ponthieux
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Akeeley Keshawn Blade
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
o.2d 1061, a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that 31 sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
- State of Louisiana v. Tarik D. Njoku La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
-
State of Louisiana v. Willie R. Sanders, Jr.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Curtis Cheley
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Frin Wayne Coward
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Gerald Samuel
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
So.2d 786, 789, writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Cody James Toucheck -Aka- Cody Toucheck
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Jason Wright
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Jesse E. Ducote A/K/A Jesse Ducote
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” [, 3](La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Richard Douglas Westbrook
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Darrel Brown Mathieu
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Kenneth Seth Thomas
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
1061, a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Sam Clark, Jr.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: 3 While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (LaApp.
-
State of Louisiana v. Stephen Allen Lukens
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
-
State v. Frinks
274 So. 3d 635
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Batiste , (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Edwin Paul Frinks
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
-
State v. Ellender
274 So. 3d 144
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Batiste , (La.App.
-
State v. Washington
274 So. 3d 98
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Batiste , (La.App.
-
State v. Washington
274 So. 3d 193
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Batiste , (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Gerrell Washington
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Gerrell Washington
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Ramon L. Ellender
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Jeremy James Arthorlee A/K/A Jeremy Authorlee
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
1061, a panel of this court observed that: 5 While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Jason L. Thomas
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Jamula L. Collins
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
-
State v. Young
270 So. 3d 770
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Batiste , (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Kenny Roy Young
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Joshua D. Sant
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
-
State v. Sant
268 So. 3d 1102
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Batiste , (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Jeffery Wayne Ross
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Albert Abshire
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
86, 789, writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
- State v. Ross 269 So. 3d 1052 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019