Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Batiste, 594 So. 2d 1.

544 citing documents.

State v. Miller 114 So. 3d 670 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Wade A. Tolliver AKA Wade W. Tolliver, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State v. Tolliver 157 So. 3d 674 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences *677 must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (LaApp.
State of Louisiana v. Alton Ray La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 2/12/03), ( (La.App.
State v. Ray 157 So. 3d 13 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 2/12/03) , ( (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Terrance Wayne Goudeau La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Christie J. Jett La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, ―it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.‖ (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Demetrius D. Nash La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
8 some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State v. Nash 112 So. 3d 409 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may 19provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Nina Lambert Newton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
7/6/00); While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, ―it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.‖ (La.
State v. Newton 129 So. 3d 25 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Kristyn Paige Hoffpauir La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, ―it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.‖ (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. James Lee Burks, III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Jimmy L. Bartie La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, ―it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.‖ (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Shane Welch La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State v. Bartie 104 So. 3d 735 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Tameshia Taylor La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Michael Wayne Collins La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. John Franklin Breaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Joseph Jones La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State v. Jones 101 So. 3d 1083 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State v. Collins 101 So. 3d 557 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Ben James Thompson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar 7 crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State v. Thompson 100 So. 3d 375 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar 18crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Marqule Craft La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, ―it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.‖ (La.App.
State v. Craft 99 So. 3d 1108 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State v. Boudreaux 98 So. 3d 881 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Although a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide guidance, “[i]t is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Thomas Herbert La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Taurean Jackson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Toby Wayne Matt La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Kenneth Bell, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Although a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes can be helpful, ―it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.‖ State v. Smith, 846 So.2d at 789 ( (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Pagel L. Arnold AKA Pagel Lynn Arnold La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Edwin N. Rivera La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” [, 3] (La.App.
State v. Matt 91 So. 3d 1252 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State v. Bell 91 So. 3d 1279 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Although a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes can be helpful, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State v. Smith, 846 So.2d at 789 ( (La.App.
State v. Jackson 92 So. 3d 1243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS HOWARD S. MOORE AKA HOWARD SU MOORE AKA PACO La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State v. Moore 87 So. 3d 324 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Vaschon S. Blount La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Michael D. Patterson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, ―it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.‖ (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Gregory Lewis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Cory R. Howard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, ―it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.‖ (La.App.
State v. Patterson 83 So. 3d 1209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Terrance A. Martin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Clarence G. Guidry, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” [, 3] (La.App.
State v. Guidry 79 So. 3d 1242 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
While a comparison of sen *1245 tences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” [, 3] (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Wendell Joseph Bienvenu La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Bernie Gene Young La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, ―it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.‖ (La.App.
State v. Young 76 So. 3d 1269 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Luke Matthew Bivens La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011