Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Smith, 845 So. 2d 1061.

721 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Sammy Cheatham La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2026
5/30/03), we further explained: In deciding whether a sentence is shocking or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals, an appellate court may consider several factors including the nature of the offense, the circumstances of the offender, the legislative purpose behind t
State of Louisiana v. Jack Ray, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Carlos Anthony Toby La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03–562 (La.5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State
State of Louisiana v. Chrystal Clues-Alexander La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and
State of Louisiana v. Antonio Jackson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State v. Batiste
State of Louisiana v. Desmond Deondre Scarborough La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03–562 (La.5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State v. Batiste
State of Louisiana v. Jaleel J. Tousant La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana v. Courtland E. King La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State v. Batiste
State of Louisiana v. Danny Trey Crossland La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State v. Batiste
State of Louisiana v. Tyrek Randall La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State v. Batis
State of Louisiana v. Joshua J. Boutte La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State v. Batiste
State of Louisiana v. Allen Hayes La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State v. Batiste
State of Louisiana v. Markus O. Andrews La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Blaine Keith Lecompte La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the part
State of Louisiana v. Marcel N. Dugar La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State
State of Louisiana v. Fred B. Vidrine La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State v. Batiste
State of Louisiana v. Byron Julies Lejeune La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State v.
State of Louisiana v. Dwight Thomas AKA Dwayne Jerome Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State v. Batiste
State of Louisiana v. Edward R. Budd La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Harrison Buckner Doyle La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
5/30/03), we further explained: In deciding whether a sentence is shocking or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals, an appellate court may consider several factors including the nature of the offense, the circumstances of the offender, the legislative purpose behind the
State of Louisiana v. Scott Robert Swank La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State v. Batiste
State of Louisiana v. Jacob Martin Michot La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State v. Batiste
State of Louisiana v. Fillmore Wright La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State
State of Louisiana v. Detron Devon Lambert La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State
State of Louisiana v. Charles Lee Fontenot La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Stacy Lynn Tharpe La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State v. Batiste
State of Louisiana v. Dakota Wayne Singletary La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Joshua Markell James La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State
State of Louisiana v. Eric Wayne Lemay La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and
State of Louisiana v. Vernell Arconze Chatman, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committe
State of Louisiana v. David K. Hawkes La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be 10 individualized to
State of Louisiana v. Joby Deforrest Duck La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State v. Batiste
State of Louisiana v. Gregory Harville, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State v.
State of Louisiana v. Edward Garriet, III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State v. Batiste
State of Louisiana v. Donald Alan Crooks La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Ashton Dean Biggs La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana Versus Lawrence Sly La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana Versus Terrell Nix La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Kayla Jean Giles Coutee La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Douglas Paul James La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (
State of Louisiana v. Damon Broussard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State v. Batiste
State of Louisiana v. Raymond Celestine, IV La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State v. Bat
State of Louisiana v. George McKinney, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State v. Batiste
State of Louisiana v. O'Shay Devan Hicks La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State v. Bat
State of Louisiana v. Freeman Eric Tucker La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Austin William Bost La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State v. Batiste
State of Louisiana v. Jacob Cobb La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State 5 v. Batiste, (LaApp.
State of Louisiana v. Rj Bartie La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State
State of Louisiana v. Earl James Darby La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and
State of Louisiana v. Joseph Barton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
5/30/03), we further explained: In deciding whether a sentence is shocking or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals, an appellate court may consider several factors including the nature of the offense, the circumstances of the offender, the legislative purpose behind the