Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Captville, 448 So. 2d 676.

1134 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Perry L. Briley La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
This Court has further clarified: “If a rational trier of fact reasonably rejects the defendant’s hypothesis of innocence, that hypothesis falls; and, unless another one creates reasonable doubt, the defendant is guilty.” (La.
State of Louisiana v. Jimmie Dixon, Jr. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
6/29/01), (quoting State v. 7 Captville, (La.
State of Louisiana v. Alfred C. Simmons La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana v. Joshua Wiggins La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana v. Joshua Cornell Palmer La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana v. Kayla Jean Giles Coutee La. 2025
2781, 2789, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); (La.
State of Louisiana v. Kenneth Gomila La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana v. Tyrone Steele La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana v. Caiden J Fruge La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana v. Sidney Myers La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
A reasonable alternative hypothesis is not one that merely “could explain the events in an exculpatory fashion,” but one that, after viewing all of the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution, “is sufficiently reasonable that a rational juror could not ‘have found proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.’” (La.
State of Louisiana v. Kristina Nichole Hoffpauir La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
Under this standard, the appellate court “must determine that the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, was sufficient to convince a rational trier of fact that all of 10 the elements of the crime had been proved beyond a reasonable doubt.” State v. Neal, 00-0674, (La.6/29/01) ().
State of Louisiana v. Zachary Markey Adams A/K/A Zachary Adams A/K/A Zachary Batiste La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana v. Deon Ray Bartie La. 2025
State of Louisiana v. Tino T. Pierre La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
State Of Louisiana v. Travis Haxford Orso La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Reginald Ruffins La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
denied, 541 U.S. 905, 124 S. Ct. 1604, 158 L. Ed. 2d 248 (2004); (La.
State of Louisiana v. Anthony Latrell Willis La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
“[T]he appellate court must determine that the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, was sufficient to convince a rational trier of fact that all of the elements of the crime had been proved beyond a reasonable doubt.”
State Of Louisiana v. Ty'rianna Jones La. 2024
3d 1047, 1049 (quoting State v. Captville , (La.
State Of Louisiana v. Latraviata Jones La. 2024
3d 1047, 1049 (quoting State v. Captville , (La.
State of Louisiana v. Detriavion D. Green La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana Versus Dartanya O. Spottsville AKA "Lo" La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
The Third Circuit found the evidence--which included a great deal of evidence other than just the testimony of Detective Young and Agent Shute regarding the defendants’ historical cell phone records--when viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution (Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (1979); (La.
State of Louisiana v. Steven Dwayne Rigmaiden La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
the Louisiana Supreme Court addressed what happens when a jury reasonably rejects the hypothesis of innocence put forth by the defendant at trial: When a case involves circumstantial evidence, and the jury reasonably rejects the hypothesis of innocence presented by the
State of Louisiana Versus Edwar Lopez AKA "Mantequilla" La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Dewayne Willie Watkins La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
A possible hypothesis is not sufficient, (La.
State Of Louisiana v. Louis Howard La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Demyron L. Skinner La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
State of Louisiana v. Christopher M Alexander La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. A. L. Simmons, II La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
State Of Louisiana v. Robert Clark, Jr. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Robert Allen McPhearson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
(1984), and Defendant’s failure to raise any new hypotheses of innocence, Defendant’s argument fails.
State of Louisiana v. David Anthony Burns La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
Considering Captville, and Defendant’s failure to 55 raise any new hypotheses, Defendant’s argument fails because we find it was reasonable for the jury to reject his claim.
State of Louisiana v. John Randal Eakins La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
2781, 2789, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
State of Louisiana v. Richard Lee Gilbert La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Isaac Thomas Gee La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Austin William Bost La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
[T]he appellate court must determine that the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, was sufficient to convince a rational trier of fact that all of the elements of the crime had been proved beyond a reasonable doubt.”
State of Louisiana v. Wesley Jackson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
State Of Louisiana v. Sean Wilkinson La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Ronald Berry Parker La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Brian M. Bonier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Sylvia, 01-1406, p. 2 (La.4/9/03)
State of Louisiana v. Elizabeth Marie Alfred A/K/A Elizabeth Alfred La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
State Of Louisiana v. Angel Galvan-Paz La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
State u Captville, n.4 ( La.
State Of Louisiana v. Dedrick L. Labee La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Jason Ray Craft La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
State Of Louisiana v. David Randolph Jenkins, Sr. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
State v, Captville, ( La.
State of Louisiana v. Tyler Nicholas Benoit La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
[T]he appellate court must determine that the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, was sufficient to convince a rational trier of fact that all of the elements of the crime had been proved beyond a reasonable doubt.”
State of Louisiana v. Trevor A. Matthews La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
State of Louisiana v. Ezra J. Coutee, II La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
filed September 20, 2006 (No. 06-6799)
State in the Interest of H.B. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana Versus Darren K. Lloyd La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
Court has further subscribed to the general 21-KA-645 9 principle in cases involving circumstantial evidence that when the fact-finder at trial reasonably rejects the hypothesis of innocence advanced by the defendant, “that hypothesis falls, and the defendant is guilty unless there is another hypothesis which raises a reasonable doubt.” (La.
State of Louisiana v. Michael J. Worley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
anded by Jackson, this Court has further subscribed to the general principle in cases involving circumstantial evidence that when the fact finder at trial reasonably rejects the hypothesis of innocence advanced by the defendant, “that hypothesis falls, and the defendant is guilty unless there is another hypothesis which raises a reasonable doubt.”